Whitby Child Support Lawyers
Where there are children of the marriage or relationship, there is a legal requirement for both parents to share the obligation of meeting the children’s financial needs. That does not change on separation or relationship breakdown. At M. G. Michaels & Associates, Whitby child support lawyers, our experience will guide you through your specific child support issues.
Child support is frequently paid by the parent with whom the children do not have their primary residence, or the higher income-earner if they have equal parenting-time, in a fixed monthly amount. Child support is the right of a child and Courts do not condone the waiving of support by one of the parents.
It is important to understand that although there are official Child Support Guidelines for Ontario, depending on your income, and how many children are involved, among other circumstances, determining child support is often a great deal more complicated than simply finding a number from within the Guidelines.
Unpaid Child Support can be made Retroactive, says Supreme Court of Canada
It used to be that if a support recipient took the payor to Court about child support after a child was no longer eligible for support, the Court would essentially dismiss the case. But, Canada’s Supreme Court unanimously ruled on September 18, 2020 that even if the child in question is over the age of majority when you start your Court case, an award for retroactive child support can be made. CBC published an article on Michel v. Graydon, or read the whole case at Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24..
This is a new interpretation of the law from the previous leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in D.B.S. v. S.R.G., 2006 SCC 37 (“D.B.S.”) where the Court ruled that child support could not be awarded retroactively under section 15 of the Divorce Act, after the subject child was no longer considered a “child of the marriage”.
The law defines a child as no longer a “child of the marriage” when they are over the age of majority (in Ontario, that is 18 years of age) and are able to withdraw from parental care and control. An adult child will still be considered a child of the marriage if they are in full-time education or are unable to withdraw due to disability or illness. Under D.B.S. the Court stated that retroactive child support Orders could only be made while the child was still considered a child of the marriage, but once they became adults and independent, it was too late to make such a claim.
What the 2020 Supreme Court Ruling on Retroactive Child Support Means for Ontarians
The Ontario Family Law Act has almost identical language to British Colombia’s section 153, on which the Michel v. Graydon case was based.
Section 37(2) and (21) of the Ontario Family Law Act, states as follows:
s. 37 (2) In the case of an order for support of a spouse or parent, if the Court is satisfied that there has been a material change in the dependant’s or respondent’s circumstances or that evidence not available on the previous hearing has become available, the Court may,
(a) discharge, vary or suspend a term of the order, prospectively or retroactively;
(b) relieve the respondent from the payment of part or all of the arrears or any interest due on them; and
(c) make any other order under section 34 that the Court considers appropriate in the circumstances referred to in section 33.
Section 37(2.1) has identical language, but with regards to support for a child instead of support for a spouse or parent.
While the B.C. situation, giving rise to the Supreme Court’s decision, has not been tested in Ontario yet, it stands to reason that this Supreme Court decision would have the same implications for payor parents in Ontario as it does in British Colombia, especially given the similarity of the wording of the family law Legislation in both Provinces.
This means that payors owing back child support can be held liable and forced to pay, even if the child is well past the age of majority and is no longer considered a child of the marriage under the law. Recipients of child support, and even children themselves, who are meant to be receiving support payments and are not, or who are receiving payments that are too low compared to the payor’s income, can apply for retroactive changes into the past, providing that they have a good reason for the delay in bringing such an application.
Paying Child Support for Children Who Are Not Yours
Both Federal and Provincial legislation states that those who have acted as a parent for a child can be required to support that child, even if they are not the biological parent. The term used for this is in “loco parentis,” which is a Latin term meaning, “acting in the place of a parent.” This means that if you move in with a partner who has a child or children from a previous relationship, and you later separate from that partner, you could be required to pay child support for those children, even if the other biological parent is paying your partner support. The likelihood of this occurring depends on numerous factors, but they essentially boil down to the strength of the bond formed between you and the children in question.
There is no deciding factor, however, some of the questions that judges have asked to try and ascertain the level of involvement between a step-parent and a child, include:
- Was the step-parent involved in the child’s day-to-day activities, such as helping with homework, activities, transportation, preparing meals and bedtime routines?
- Did the step-parent ever discipline the child as a parent would?
- Did the step-parent ever financially support the child, such as assisting with school costs, clothing, events, etc.?
- Did the step-parent treat the child as their own, such as buying birthday gifts, inviting them to family events, include them on vacations?
- Did the step-parent ever introduce themselves as a parent of the child to others in the community?
- Did the step-parent ever consider adopting the child?
- What relationship, if any, does the child have with the other biological parent?
Once a Court decides that a person has stood in the place of a parent for a child, it is likely that they will have to pay child support. It would be unfair, to a child who has relied on you as a parent for a number of years, to suddenly be cut off from that support, physically, emotionally and financially.
The second step would be to determine the amount of support that you would have to pay. Again there are a number of factors, but it could range from the full Child Support Guideline table amount based on your income, a set-off amount taking into account payments made by the child’s biological parent, or no support if a parental relationship is not found. If there is a bond, however, the non-biological parent could also seek parenting time with the child(ren).
The answer to ‘if’ and ‘how much’ child support can vary wildly across jurisdictions and of course depending on the facts in your particular case. Nonetheless, it is important to know that even acting as a parent for someone else’s children could mean that you have to continue to financially support them after your relationship ends, whether you marry the other parent or not.